What if you could defeat the Status Quo0

By Tibor Shantotibor.shanto@sellbetter.ca

TV Head

All this week I have posted clips from a recent interview with Ago Cluytens, for his Coaching Masters Series.  We dealt with a number of issues around selling to buyers who are traditionally referred to as being Status Quo.  Being the weekend, I thought it a good time to post the whole interview for your weekend lounging pleasure.

Always interested in what you think, and whether you are more prepared to go forth and sell where many sellers and pundits fear to go.  Take a look, and let me know.

If you enjoy this there are more on Ago’s site.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

 

Selling In The Right Time Frame – Sales eXchange 1962

By Tibor Shantotibor.shanto@sellbetter.ca

Time Frame

One common theme here and at other quality sales sources, is the need to cover the entire buying organization, top down, bottom up, and all sides.  This not only eliminates the need to go around or over someone, but delivers a number of benefits and opportunities to sell and establish contacts and relationships.    Over the years there has been a lot written about the need for sellers to be “multi-lingual” in order to properly communicate with all levels of the buying organization.  Executives/decision makers/VPs in your target organization speak a differently than say the implementers or users of the product even when they are talking about the same thing.   If one or both do not understand what you are saying it is a problem.  When you call a on a VP, and deliver your message in implementer speak, you risk being banished down in the organization, because that is what you sound like, where you may be stuck for a while, extending you sales cycle, or forever, and never getting the sale.

Understanding how to communicate with the different groups, what their specific drivers, issues and hot buttons are, is a must, especially when they have viable alternatives to your offering, and they always do.  As you master this you will learn that not only do these groups speak different languages, they function in different time planes, which means you will also need to learn how to exist in multiple time frames.

VP’s will tend to have a longer time horizon than implementers.  In a very general way, there are those focused on strategy and the strategic direction of the company.  Once those strategies are decided and set, and things begin to move to the tactical execution of the strategy, as a result the time horizons of the implementers is shorter.  If you fail to manage this, it could be much more fatal than the language issue.  In fact mastering the different time frames will directly help with language, if you know where they are focused, you can speak to it, but if you are positioning for a different time than they are looking at, you are bound to miscommunicate.

If you look at the continuum of a purchase, it is likely that someone had an idea for a product or an initiative at the executive level.  They will then gauge support among their peers, while helping to shape the big picture.  They may then have some of the team leaders scope things out, costs/benefits, challenges, etc.; this may include consulting with outside parties, a great opportunity to introduce your company long before vendor selection process starts.  Once the project gets the go ahead, the implementers take centre stage.

Goes without saying that if you can insert yourself in the process at the scoping stage or before, you would have a great advantage, one reason to call high in the organization.  But if you speak the wrong language, and talk about feature/benefit, you in the wrong time frame, and in the wrong “country”.

Another advantage to getting in early, will be your ability to influence and impact their strategy, and with that done, you will be in a much better position when it comes to vendor selection, after all, you’re “a safe choice” vis-à-vis the executive, and while price will always be an issue, you will have set the standard much earlier in the process, or if you will time frame.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

Objections – Not What They Appear to Be (#video)0

TV Head

Many sellers believe that Objections are the bane of their existence, and one can understand why.  On the other hand, if you step back, you can actually see Objections in a more positive light, and see them as something you can leverage to move sales forward, and win deals other less enlightened sellers may miss.

Below is the first of a series of videos dealing with objections, and how to make them work for you in winning sales.

Objections 1

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

Online Sales and New Sales Tax Regulations29

Guest Post – Megan Totka

Some Internet sales regulations, and subsequently sales tactics, may be about to change. Is this a good change or a bad change? It really depends on who you ask.

For quite some time now, most online retailers have been able to avoid charging sales tax to customers that are located outside of the state that the company’s headquarters are located in. Online shoppers use commerce sites to find better bargains than can often be found in brick and mortar stores. Even holiday season shopping has been changed by internet sales. This is because of the lack of sales tax, and often, free shipping.

Many states, however, are now starting to wise up when it comes to shoppers taking their business to online-only companies. Because most states are still feeling a big pinch from the ongoing economic recession, they are noticing the loss of revenue from these uncollected taxes.

The state of New York is pushing the hardest to be able to collect taxes on online sales. Amazon, likely the biggest online retailer, is actually suing the state. New York has passed a new requirement that online companies must charge sales tax on any sales that are shipped to consumers located in the state. The governor of New York even wants to tax internet downloads, such as those from iTunes.

Many people are turning to the Internet more and more for not only specialty products, but everyday goods as well. If you own a brick and mortar store, you may be thinking, how can I compete with that?  The first step is to start your business online.  Did you know that Amazon will ship toilet paper and snack products alongside your Kindle downloads and electronic orders? Some people certainly do, and these purchases are exactly what is up for debate as far as charging sales tax.

So how will this effect online sales tactics? Well, it could and should encourage online companies to lower their prices, if at all possible. However, many online shops are already undercutting their physical-location counterparts. Should they be expected to lower costs even more? Is that even possible?

The other way that companies could combat having to charge sales tax would be to offer free shipping all the time. Some online retailers already do this with a purchase over a certain amount of money. Amazon offers their Prime membership, where for $79 a year, a shopper gets unlimited 2 day shipping. Again though, this may cut into a company’s bottom line. Probably the best answer at this point? Wait it out. New legislation regulating what online purchases can or cannot be taxed is likely forthcoming. When the decision is made, you can talk with a tax consultant to see what the best move for your company is.  In the meantime, research what products would continue to be less expensive to purchase online, even with the addition of tax, and see what you can do to have consumers buy from you instead.

Megan Totka is the Chief Editor for ChamberofCommerce.com. She specializes on the topic of sales. ChamberofCommerce.com helps small businesses grow their business on the web and facilitates connectivity between local businesses and more than 7,000 Chambers of Commerce worldwide.

Yes, and…37

Sometimes it is not what you say but how you say that help the buyer get engaged.  Take a look and give it a go.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

More Information ≠ Better Informed90

Last week I got an e-mail from one of the traditional providers in the sales enablement business.  It seems they have discovered social media, Sales 2.0, and felt they had to let the world know.  Further, they shared a couple of “big reveals”; one was that “buyers” will go to the web and the social web long before they will “call a sales person or company”, in fact completing over 60% of the buy cycle.  Second, that there is a whole lot more information available to buyers than ever before; according to these oracles of sales, a customer can access some “20 times more data about you and your competitors than they could 5 years ago”.

Let’s deal with the first one, for those buyers who have completed over 50% of the buy cycle before engaging, it is more accurate to say that the seller involved is an Order Taker, not a Salesperson.  You can tell your friends and family that you are in sales, but if that’s you, you’re an order taker, end of story.  I am sure order takers need training too, may I recommend George Clinton.

The second, is mistaking data with information, and information with knowledge and action.  There is no arguing that there is a lot more data out there, but I would argue that rather than that being an impediment or reducing the role of the sales person (real ones), it offers the prepared sales person an opportunity to succeed further.  With that fire hose of information/data, comes confusion, misinformation, and the opportunity to misdirect.  Real decision makers are seeking clarity and judgement above all.

I see it as an opportunity for a seller to bring clarity, advice and recommendation and direction based on the buyers’ objectives rather than the buyer’s digital footprint.  Sellers have to rise above the data, but many seem to feel more comfortable swimming in it, hoping it will lead them to a sale.  Good sellers will filter the data, and present actionable advice to decision makers looking to change where they are as opposed to getting more information, real sellers provide better and more actionable knowledge.

More is not better, clarity and action are!  In the last couple of weeks we have had concrete examples of this.  Apparently on Monday night there were millions of tweets about the storm, great, were you better informed?  There was also a whole lot more water out there too.  Did you know more?  During the presidential debates, there were millions of tweets, one media outlet counted how many tweeted out #bindersfullofwomen, it was in the millions, lots ha, but were people better informed?  Knowledge and the ability to act on it have value, data is sold (or given away) by the pound.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

‘Why Not’, Not Why83

Sales people are aware that their biggest competitor in the market is complacency, the lack of the buyer willingness to change, the status quo. Change is hard; it involves time, effort, and the need to overcome the fear of the unknown.  This is why even when things are not perfect, visibly not meeting expectations, buyers will stick with less than they deserve, fear is a strong emotion.

Add to this the fact that sellers are already predisposed to the view that people buy based on emotions, which they then rationalize.  As stated above fear is an emotion, and as a result sellers are up against the dynamic that buyer feel a strong reaction to a strong emotion, one that keeps buyers spending a lot of time rationalizing why they do not need to change, why they can “make due” rather than risk change.

This triggers two common approaches in sales and marketing types.  The first, probably the most common, and well disguised when presented by the guru community, never quiet expressed as this, but essentially: “wait till something changes, then pounce”.  To which I say, there is no sales metric for waiting, do you know why, because it is not your job to wait, it is your job to sales happen.

The second, a bit more logical, is to try to minimize the fear and risk associated with changing (to your product), by putting a lot of effort into proving why your offering is better, safer, and economically more sound that the buyer’s current circumstance.  Unfortunately in the process we are pushing up against the buyer’s safety zone, heightening their fear of the unknown.  Every feature and benefit we recite causes them to cling more firmly to the safety of the status quo. We unintentionally work against ourselves.

Given all this, why not turn you efforts to undermining where they are now?  Rather than trying to entice them to go where you want them to go, introduce some doubt and uncertainty into where they are now, and where their current path will lead them.  The one emotion that is worse than the fear of the unknown is the fear of the known. If I can focus the discussion on why the current situation is untenable, why if they left it unaddressed it will bring exposure, the discussion turns to how to avoid that, rather than avoiding the risk of change, the unknown.

If you know how to articulate why your product is truly better for the buyer, what the benefits are, financial, productivity, time advantage, etc., then you have the speaking points you’ll need to turn the table.  Use that knowledge to develop the type of questions that drive the discussion to WHY NOT for the status quo, rather than WHY change.  Your why is the safe alternative to the why not.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

A Sales Association #Webinar31

“Leveraging Value from Engaging the Buyer to Closing the Sale” – A Sales Association Webinar
Tuesday, October 30 – 2 p.m. EST / 1 p.m. CST / Noon MST / 11 a.m. PST (1 hour in length)

On Tuesday October 30, I have the privilege to deliver a webinar for The Sales Association – I will be talking to specific steps sellers can take to delivering and leveraging value throughout the sale.

Almost every conversation about selling starts or ends with the concept of value. At the same time, there are as many different understandings and definitions of value as there are sellers and buyers. Without a clear and actionable definition of value, many conversations between buyers and sellers are less than effective, and do not help create a buy.

Starting with a clear definition of value, participants will learn the five-step process to leveraging value throughout the sale, from the initial engagement to winning the client.

Steps include:

  • Identifying and validating buyer’s objectives
  • Understanding why buyers really buy
  • Why Buyers buy and don’t buy from you and your company
  • Converting the above to Impact Questions for quality conversations
  • A structured follow-through approach to maximize impact and progress

Participants will learn how to use this process to create alignment with the buyer, their objectives and buying process.

Click Her to Register Now!

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

Pipeline Vs. Opportunity Review – Sales eXchange 169128

Some things in sales can be called by various names without much consequence, the underlying subject being very much the same, prospect – potential buyer, information gathering – discovery, and many others; it comes down to words not actions or outcomes.  In other cases the semantics are very important, and cannot be simply interchanged for convenience.  A stellar example of this is the confusion between pipeline reviews and opportunity reviews.  They are not the same, you can equate a pipeline with a funnel and funnel review, it is not the same as an opportunity review, and pretending they are will cost you time and money.

For me both type of reviews are important, in many sales organizations necessary, and if not done right, or just plain not done, could have big consequences.  One of the biggest is lack of engagements by the reps, many having spent countless tedious and unproductive hours in some of these meetings, simply stop taking them seriously, a disengagement that has big negative impact on success.

A pipeline review is a snapshot of the state of the pipeline and the directly contributing factors, usually activity.  Regardless of how you look at your pipeline or funnel, it is likely to have a minimal number of clear stages or sections.  Lead – Prospects – Pre-Proposal – Proposal – Initial (verbal) Agreement – Won Business (Closed).  A pipeline review just needs to look at the opportunities at each stage – are they real, next steps, and volume based on the individual rep’s documented conversion rates.  Are there enough leads to sustain the subsequent stages, and is the rep focused on the right activities.  Reviewing this in a brief efficient, and frequent fashion, leads to continuous movement of the right things through the pipeline or down the funnel.  You can do this review in as little as five minutes per rep, if you have 8 reps, you can be done and wiser in 40 minutes.  If you have a large volume of deals you can cut it back to a more than significant representative sample that will ensure short and snappy meetings.  These pipeline reviews should be done as a group, and in my opinion weekly, you don’t all need to be in the same room, and with today’s technology can be done from anywhere, including the parking lot of your next appointment.

An opportunity review is much more, and could involve a heavy dose of coaching, as such the first difference is that these are done individually with each rep, and therefore not as frequently, not more than once a month.  In this meeting you review each opportunity, how the rep arrived at where they are, strategies on what to do next, and develop a specific action plan.  This where the coaching is key, using the review not only to impact the outcome, but to directly impact how your reps can sell better using a real live scenario as a springboard.  Helping the reps to not only widen their view of the deal, but others like it.  It is an occasion to examine why some opportunities died, and why specifically some were one, or did not take a decision.

Trying to cram both into one meeting is useless, and typifies the KPI mentality many bring to the process, “did it, I can check it off the list”.  They conduct these meetings neither to help their reps, or to understand the state of their pipeline (all their reps’ pipelines rolled up to one), they do it as a CYA exercise.  Usually because they have to go into to a meeting with their seniors, and want to be in a position to answer questions they anticipate.  If they were to conduct both types of meeting separately, ensuring they achieve what they need to from each meeting they would be way ahead.  They would be in a position to directly influence the outcome of their reps activities, and by extension the outcome of the meeting with their reps and results presented.  They would also be in a stronger position going into the meetings with their superiors, not only answering anticipated questions, but presenting in a way and with content that would negate the questions and focus on results.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

Playing Sales Hide and Seek – Sales eXchange 16899

All the pundits tell us that in “today’s economy”, buyers are just too busy to deal with anything unless they deem it to be critical to their success.  This is why many sellers have difficulty getting through, they fail to penetrate the “prove value to me” wall erected by prospects, and in effect they fail the BS test.  So if one does get through, it should not only be recognized, but should at the very least begin a real exchange about the buyers objectives and how the seller is in a position to advance or help the prospect achieve them.  But as it turns out, this is not always the case.

It seems that in many instances, buyers and sellers enter a game of “Sales Hide and Seek”, rather than a real business discussion, taking an ambiguous and unproductive approach rather than a direct discussion of the issues and potential answers.  Both parties are guilty, and both pay the price by extending the sales cycle, costing time, money and opportunity.  The buyer takes longer to implement the solution, at times the wrong solution, taking longer to realize the benefits delivered.  Sellers extend their cycle and limit their opportunity to sell and engage with more buyers or other real buyers.  Even as the buyer becomes a customer, they are impacted by the company spending more money and resources to selling than to R&D and product improvement which directly impacts the customer base.

Sellers are told to go for relationships rather than dealing directly with issues, trying too hard to be genteel, rather than provoking, and getting to the root of the issue.  Winning the buyer’s respect and trust by willing to deal with tough situations, not hiding from them.  Rather than missing repeated opportunities to demonstrate their understanding, their expertise and ability to make a difference especially in though areas.  Sellers talk about “finding the pain”, but only go for superficial pain which leads the buyer to hide their intent, as they lose confidence in the buyer due to their inability to deal with the buyer’s real challenges.  Circling issues, only focusing on “pain” they can see and think they can solve.  With this soft approach, rather than being provocative and relevant, makes these sellers look like kids playing hide and seek.

The buyers are no better, one can argue worse.  They give up an hour of their valuable “crazy busy time”, only to make it unproductive for them, their companies, and the seller.   They clam up when asked direct questions, as though the seller was the opposition, rather than a professional investing time and resources to help the buyer reach their objectives. Again one can’t blame them if they figure out early that they are meeting with a light weight sellers.  But I have attended a number of sales calls where the rep had prepared well, asked the right questions, going to the root of the buyers objectives and barriers to reaching them, only to be met with an evasive buyer, incomplete in their answers, not sharing key data, or access to those who have answers.  Again, looking more like a game of hide and seek rather than a process for improvement.

In the end, the goal is not to lay blame for the almost counterproductive time wasted by both sellers and buyers, but to encourage both parties to work towards a common goal, if one is plausible and/or possible, rather than playing a time consuming game of hide and seek.  The game has no winner, just adds cost and time to the sale.

What’s in Your Pipeline?
Tibor Shanto

wordpress stat